|
Post by mfwilkie on Nov 22, 2008 20:30:41 GMT -5
A wall of glass and smothered light sever night and the force of its winds
from me and an itch that thoughts might be a language only eyes can express.
Somewhere close by, a muse struggles with unmodified stars.
|
|
|
Post by Marion Poirier on Nov 29, 2008 22:34:43 GMT -5
I'll come back to this later, Maggie when I can focus better.
I like the language - but I'm having trouble with your intent - need to read it several more times.
M
A wall of glass and smothered light sever night and the force of its winds
from me and an itch that thoughts might be a language only eyes can express.
Somewhere close by, a muse struggles with unmodified stars.
|
|
|
Post by purplejacket on Dec 1, 2008 13:37:41 GMT -5
Hi Mags. I read this. I had fun filling in the holes. Not sure if the muse is yours or not. Works either way.
|
|
|
Post by Marion Poirier on Dec 1, 2008 13:54:07 GMT -5
Maggie sometimes only the author can understand the meaning of a poem - can't grasp the first couplet, but it can mean anything you want it to mean.
In the second one I love this part:
thoughts might be a language only eyes can express.
Thats a great line (s) never thought of it that way - but it's a profound trurh.
I think I understand the third couplet or at least have my own interpretation; I am certainly not a foreigner when it comes to struggling with expressing words.
I can see now where the 2nd and 3rd couplet is related - still thinking about the first one.
I couldn't fanthom the whole at first - now that I've strugged with it, I find it to be intriguing and very fine work. M
|
|
|
Post by purplejacket on Dec 1, 2008 14:25:23 GMT -5
I see a person sitting at her night-window. The window forms a barrier between the watcher and the windy night. She's also separated from the itch about thoughts...eyes. It's interesting to call it an itch - serves the purpose to be something uncomfortable - something she wants to scratch.
She can't think of a good adjective to give the stars she sees out there. She can only use her eyes to say what they are. Maybe the stars have pulled their eyebrows together, and are looking out over a pair of specs.
|
|
|
Post by Marion Poirier on Dec 1, 2008 21:17:42 GMT -5
Maggie this poem is very profound and I think I'm getting it - if not your intent - making sense of it.
Thanks Amanda for helping me understand the first couplet - sounds logical to me. This poem is probably for deep thinkers only - I kid you not. (GG)
Now for a suggestion to T or L, Maggie:
I think the itch sort of throws off the train of thought - it did for me. Why make it more complex than it is by bringing in another element? Most of us are not that smart - speaking for myself only. Knowing the terrible plight of our planet - does not speak well for humanity.
Thanks Maggie, for making me think with my rusty brain - and you, too, Amanda.
M
|
|
|
Post by ramadevi on Dec 9, 2008 6:56:41 GMT -5
I love this! Especially the enigmatic, but philosophically thoughyt provoking, unmodified stars. Wish i came up with that one! as well as the language only eyes can express.
Bravo.
|
|
|
Post by Ron Wallace (Scotshawk) on Dec 13, 2008 19:05:48 GMT -5
How long must I beg for a collection of these pieces? This is excellent, Maggie. Ron
|
|
|
Post by mfwilkie on Dec 16, 2008 5:15:17 GMT -5
How about one more "losing" Yankee season, Cowboy? ;D
(Just remember you started this latest go-round!)
Seriously, though, I'm glad you liked this one.
I'm actually serious about that losing season, too.
Ah! Sports fans!!!
Mags
|
|
|
Post by ramadevi on Dec 27, 2008 9:37:22 GMT -5
Yes, these are worth begging for. i love those unmodified stars. Came back to get another glimpse of them.
|
|