|
Limbo
Feb 24, 2008 3:39:09 GMT -5
Post by wavemaker9 (Rick D.) on Feb 24, 2008 3:39:09 GMT -5
Is there reason in this sleepless night as distortions ply for spatial concept of big-little, over-under, in-out, then-now, and the right-right? Is a fixation on right the wrong state to assess if anything is, when no one but me agreed to sleep on it.
Was I not awake or dreaming I am? Will I not know my alarm?
|
|
zambatriste
Member
Does this mean you liked the meatloaf?
Posts: 26
|
Limbo
Feb 24, 2008 7:55:13 GMT -5
Post by zambatriste on Feb 24, 2008 7:55:13 GMT -5
Good morning Rick,
Being, myself, in that sort of nebulous, partially aware state as I'm reading this....I am enjoying that it means something different during each read-through. Right is, at first, moral right. After a few reads it becomes political right. Now, after reading, "when no one but me agreed to sleep on it" .....I think you mean the right side of the bed.
I'm going back to sleep now......
Zzzzzz
|
|
|
Limbo
Feb 29, 2008 15:42:06 GMT -5
Post by mfwilkie on Feb 29, 2008 15:42:06 GMT -5
I keep coming back to this trying to figure out what's nippin' at my ear.
I'm thinking it's the word 'concept'. For some reason, and i can't explain it, I want to read:
for spatial definitions of
And the first question seems an unfinished thought to me, Rick, like 'for' should be part of the question.
Will I know my alarm? Might be an ending to consider.
Maggie
|
|