|
Post by David Nelson Bradsher on May 4, 2008 16:49:51 GMT -5
Blue Flame
My firelight is burning low. The wood is spent; the flame will dwindle. So tell me how my love can grow; I have no wood to kindle.
The lighter fluid, used last night, is empty. In another age, what method could restore the light? What made the fire rage?
I wouldn’t try to burn this twig. I wouldn’t dare to use the pok- er with a flimsy piece that isn’t big. I need a cord of oak.
I’ve heard, though, of a flame the hue of robin’s eggs; the sky; my eyes; a brilliant Carolina blue that helps the fire rise.
My shriveled blaze, about to wilt, is soon to be an ashen flower. I need the flame that Pfizer built. It only takes an hour.
|
|
|
Post by Jonathan Morey Weiss-Namaste47 on May 4, 2008 17:06:33 GMT -5
I read this on two levels, David. One the literal, the humorous, the second on a deeper, more personal. That may not have been your intent..................but the reader brings his/her own interpretation, and that is the expanse of poetry.
|
|
|
Post by David Nelson Bradsher on May 4, 2008 17:08:02 GMT -5
Jon, thank you, my friend. Yes, on the surface, or below it, it is a light piece, but depending on the vantage point of the reader, it could also resonate deeper.
I appreciate your deftness and insight.
|
|
|
Post by ramadevi on May 7, 2008 8:53:22 GMT -5
I see the deeper layer too.
not sure about the pok-er spanning two lines, but it grows on me with second read.
my favorite part is verses four and five.
It is a thoughtful write and interesting too.
Warm regards, rama devi
|
|
|
Post by David Nelson Bradsher on May 7, 2008 13:14:10 GMT -5
Thank you, Rama. I don't use the hyphenated words carrying over very often, but Richard Wilbur did it with success, so I thought I'd give it a shot.
|
|
|
Post by ramadevi on May 9, 2008 11:09:36 GMT -5
I think it works just fine, David! *smiles*
|
|